Casa for Children of Essex County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222745450
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Newark, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 8627544681
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Civil Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,177,570
- Expenses
- $1,223,122
- Assets
- $1,609,180
- Liabilities
- $47,361
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DARREN WOOLFORD (President)
- KIMBERLY MOORE (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- MARLA HIGGINBOTHAM (Executive Dir.): $111,729 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Recruit, train and supervise volunteers to advocate for abused, neglected and abandoned children placed in foster homes. Casa volunteers ensure children's best interests remain the priority and their needs met while working to establish a safe, stable and permanent home.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization serves all 22 municipalities in essex county, advocating for the needs of children from birth to age 21 removed from home due to abuse and/or neglect and placed in foster homes or residential facilities. After completion of a rigorous 30-hour curriculum, casa volunteers are sworn in by a family judge and named to a case by court order. In addition to forming a consistent relationship with the child, casa volunteers gather insight from service providers, schools, healthcare professionals, and foster families to advocate for informed decisions that support the childs safety, stability, and long-term success.during fiscal year 2025, casa for children of essex county strengthened its advocacy and service model for youth involved in the foster care system while marking the organizations 40th anniversaryan important milestone reflecting four decades of community partnership and child-centered advocacy.over the course of the year, the organization served 332 children and utilized the service of 155 volunteers who donated 10,819 hours of time to fulfill the mission. Program service expenses presented here do not include $400,002 in donated volunteer services, an estimate based on new jerseys volunteer hourly value as determined by independent sector, which calculates the value of a volunteer hour at $36.97.a major focus of the year was the continued integration of trauma-informed advocacy throughout casa essexs volunteer and staff training framework. By equipping advocates with deeper knowledge of the impact of trauma on child development and well-being, casa essex strengthened the quality of advocacy provided to children and youth in foster care. This approach supports more individualized recommendations to the court, promotes stability in placements and services, and ensures that the voices and experiences of youth are meaningfully reflected in decision-making.casa essex also enhanced its commitment to data-informed program management by refining outcome tracking and case data systems. These improvements strengthen the organizations ability to measure program effectiveness, monitor youth outcomes, and provide advocates and staff with timely information that supports effective advocacy and coordinated service delivery.throughout the year, casa essex continued to work in close partnership with the essex county judiciary, the New Jersey child welfare system, and a network of community-based organizations. These collaborations help ensure that youth served through casa receive coordinated access to educational, health, and supportive services, while also strengthening system-level advocacy on behalf of children in foster care.as casa essex commemorates its 40th year of service, the organization remains focused on sustaining and expanding high-quality advocacy so that every child in foster care has a trained volunteer advocate dedicated to ensuring their safety, stability, and opportunity for a successful future.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.2%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 84.4%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.9%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.32; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.2% of revenue deployed · 84.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.