Carter Elementary Parent Teacher Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 834273912
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Rosenberg, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9366979744
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $84,463
- Expenses
- $78,750
- Assets
- $63,164
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NICOLE ROMERO (PRESIDENT)
- SARA DRESNER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JASMINE ADEOYE (Vice President of Fundraising)
- MICHAELA BURGMAN (Vice President of Membership)
- JAMIE CANO (Vice President of Volunteers)
People named in this filing
- NICOLE ROMERO (PRESIDENT)
- SARA DRESNER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KAYLA SMITH (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote academic and social enrichment of Carter Elementary students and bring together families, teachers, and school staff to collaborate effectively in the education of every child. To develop between educators and the community united efforts to secure for every student the highest advantages in physical, social, and emotional well-being and development.
What it reported doing in 2024
Carter Elementary PTO provided assistance to the school including car pick up hang tags, staff appreciation, school celebrations, lanyards, and class performances.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.3%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 82.9%; rating input score 83
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.8%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 34.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.3% of revenue deployed · 82.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $65K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.