Carson Tahoe Health
Legal name: Carson Tahoe Continuing Care Hospital Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261635811
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2023
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Carson City, NV, US
- Phone
- (775) 445-8000
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,596,219
- Expenses
- $4,822,163
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE JOY (PRESIDENT, EX OFFICIO)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHELLE JOY (PRESIDENT, EX OFFICIO): $941,642 total reported compensation
- DAVID BAKER (VP, CMO, EX OFFICIO): $679,683 total reported compensation
- KATIE KUCERA (VP, CFO, DIRECTOR): $585,619 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.
What it reported doing in 2023
Carson tahoe continuing care hospital, inc. ("ctcch") is a 29-bed long-term acute care hospital in carson city, Nevada. Ctcch provides medical care to patients who require treatment in an acute care setting for an extended period of time. Conditions appropriate for treatment in a ltach include the following: medically complex respiratory disorders including tracheotomy, ventilator dependent, cardiac/cardiovascular conditions, renal disease, and oncology. In 2023, ctcch discharged 65 patients and provided 1,503 days of patient care. The hospital facility closed in june 2023.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 73% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.4%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 41.8%; rating input score 42
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.9%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 43.4% of revenue deployed · 41.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $942K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.