Carson City Community Counseling Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880212354
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2023
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Carson City, NV, USA
- Phone
- 775-882-3945
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,543,218
- Expenses
- $6,122,982
- Assets
- $12,198,272
- Liabilities
- $2,287,290
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT FLIEGER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROL BASAGOITIA (ADMINISTRATOR): $308,194 total reported compensation
- SUZANN GORDON (CLINICAL NURSE PRACTITIONE): $201,350 total reported compensation
- DIANA MAYORAL ORTIZ (CLINICAL DIRECTOR): $164,716 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
It is the mission of the Community Counseling Center (“CCC”) to provide high quality, outpatient care for low and no- income community members suffering from emotional and acute and chronic behavioral health issues.
What it reported doing in 2023
Provision of crisis mental health services, screening/assessment/diagnosis/risk assessment, patient-centered treatment planning, outpatient mental health and substance use services, outpatient clinic primary care screening/monitoring, targeted case management, psychiatric rehabilitation services, and peer support/family support counselor services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 67
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.1%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $41.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.8%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.99; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 59.1% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $5.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $308K · 12 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $130K reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.