Carson City Cares Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463185779
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Carson City, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7752973419
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal-Related N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $413,657
- Expenses
- $218,645
- Assets
- $777,016
- Liabilities
- $140,177
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LINDA BUCHANAN (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- LINDA BUCHANAN (PRESIDENT): $20,065 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide shelter and services for homeless and at-risk cats and kittens in northern Nevada. Place adoptable cats in new forever homes and provide sanctuary for unadoptable cats
What it reported doing in 2024
Adoptions - homeless cats are rescued, rehabilitated, spayed/neutered, vaccinated, and adopted into loving homes. Each year we help hundreds of cats, many with medical conditions that require treatment
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 5
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.3%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 68.3%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.1%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.55; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.2%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.3% of revenue deployed · 68.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $149K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $20K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.