Carroll County Health Services Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
520691413
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Westminster, MD, USA
Phone
4108716589
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$155,892
Expenses
$4,000
Assets
$501,934,654
Liabilities
$25,719

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GARRETT W HOOVER (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT/COO OF CHC)
  • CYNTHIA ROLDAN MD (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT, MEDICAL STAFF (AS OF 07/01/2024))
  • NEIL M MELTZER (DIRECTOR/LBH PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • LESLIE R SIMMONS (PRESIDENT CHC/COO LBH)

Highest reported compensation

  • NEIL M MELTZER (DIRECTOR/LBH PRESIDENT/CEO): $4,111,501 total reported compensation
  • LESLIE R SIMMONS (PRESIDENT CHC/COO LBH): $2,078,988 total reported compensation
  • DAVID H KRAJEWSKI (ASSISTANT TREASURER): $1,986,680 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support the mission of carroll hospital center, inc., and its subsidiaries.

What it reported doing in 2024

Carroll county health services corporation is a non-profit, non-stock membership corporation incorporated in Maryland engaged in supporting carroll hospital center, inc., including by assisting in overseeing the operations of its subsidiaries. Carroll hospital center, inc. Is a wholly controlled subsidiary of the corporation. The hospital operates a 164 bed acute care hospital with both inpatient and outpatient care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 36
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 4.1%; rating input score 4
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 97.4%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 125,483.66; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14,325.6%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 4.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $4.1M · 21 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 42 of 42 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 51 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.