Carrington Youth Sports
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853544712
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Carrington, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7016507445
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,782
- Expenses
- $28,873
- Assets
- $176,264
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHAD BICKETT (PRESIDENT)
- LUKE KUTZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TODD BICKETT (REPRESENTATIVE)
- JUSTIN KOLLMAN (REPRESENTATIVE)
- CHAD BICKETT (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
This non-profit is being set up to run our youth baseball, football and basketball programs. These programs help the youth in our town participate in these sports. These activities help the kids in our community have sports to participate in and gain experiences through playing with friends, learning competitivness and gaining lasting relationships. The activities all take place in our hometown of carrington, nd. Some of the teams play outside of town against other local town, but all practice's and most games take place in our hometown. We will be funded through grants, donations and fundraising opportunities from all groups.
What it reported doing in 2022
Football: the is for the 3rd through 6th grade participants in our youth football league. We gain money through concessions, fundraising and entry fees. The money is spent on equipment, rent and also camps. We conduct our practices and games inside the carrington city park and utilizes ball diamond outfields for our foot
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.4%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.1; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -76.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.