Carries Closet
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 934724507
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8173084538
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Personal Social Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $69,312
- Expenses
- $23,067
- Assets
- $50,454
- Liabilities
- $1,310
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Brian W Tulbert (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- COURTNEY TULBERT (Pres/Treasurer)
- Brian W Tulbert (Vice President)
- Elizabeth Carter (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Carrie's Closet strives to encourage strength, dignity, and confidence in a supportive and inclusive space by using fashion and relationships to empower women facing difficult circumstances.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Success StoreA free boutique for women coming out of domestic violence, human trafficking, going back into the work force, preparing for court appearances, experiencing homelessness, etC.FWISD Clothing ClosetsWe are on the FWISD Community Hot Spot list and in the district's data base as a supply for counselors and school personnel where they can reach out for clothing for specific clients' needs or general needs to fill clothing closets.Private Shopping and StylingWe offer 2-3 hour events for other non-profit organizations to bring their female clients to shop at no cost and receive free styling services to teach them how to learn to dress professionally while keeping their personal style and confidence at the fore front.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25.6%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 75%; rating input score 75
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 66.7%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.19; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 48.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 25.6% of revenue deployed · 75% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.