Carpe Diem String Quartet

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204351770
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Powell, OH, USA
Phone
6146576158
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Music Groups, Bands, Ensembles

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$233,476
Expenses
$177,026
Assets
$264,852
Liabilities
$2,748

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • KORINE FUJIWARA (TREAS/EXCUTI): $30,473 total reported compensation
  • ARIANA NELSON (TRUSTEE): $24,523 total reported compensation
  • SAM WEISER (TRUSTEE): $24,473 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Forging a new identity for chamber music by championing the music of living composers, undertaking daring and creative projects with other artists and art forms, and promoting music as a healing art.

What it reported doing in 2024

Recordings: - sessions for chamber music of korine fujiwara. June 4-7 2025. Judith sherman, producer mike quam, engineer musicians: carpe diem string quartet members sam weiser, violin; marisa ishikawa, violin; korine fujiwara, viola; ariana nelson, cello; with guests peter cooper, oboe; yoshi ishikawa, bassoon. Recorded at imig auditorium, university of Colorado boulder. Label tbd, release tbd - sessions for sonata in f major for string quartet by randy hathaway. July 2, 2024. Musicians: carpe diem string quartet members sam weiser, violin; marisa ishikawa, violin; korine fujiwara, viola; ariana nelson, cello. Recorded at bear creek studios, woodinville wa. Label tbd, release tbd world premieres: - sarah gibson . I do not want horses or diamonds - mark lomax ii . Ubuntu - laura kaminsky . Vanishing point - korine fujiwara . Mosey concerts: - carpe diem presented a full season of in-person concerts in columbus oh. These concerts were free for persons under 21. They were also livestreamed with free access and pay-as-you-can donation. - carpe diem returned to carnegie hall in New York ny on february 27, 2025, playing to a packed house featuring two world premieres and a New York premiere. Works by fujiwara, kaminsky, lomax, satoh, and prokofiev. - carpe diem continued its free performances for elementary schools and care centers for rehabilitation, skilled nursing, memory, and respite, as well as retirement and independent living communities. - carpe diem continued touring and teaching domestically, presenting coachings, masterclasses, and concerts in pittsburgh pa, dillon co, boulder co, tacoma and quilcene wa, and houston and austin tx. Community partnerships: -the families and friends network -on my own foundation -the chamber music connection

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 77
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.2%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 96.4%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.2%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 58.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.2% of revenue deployed · 96.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $171K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $30K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.