Carpe Artista Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452479668
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Smyrna, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6159844038
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $633,422
- Expenses
- $703,344
- Assets
- $232,778
- Liabilities
- $898,901
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RON ALLEY (CEO)
People named in this filing
- ERIC RICHEY (DIRECTOR)
- WALTER ALLEY (DIRECTOR)
- ADAM MCOWEN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Transforming cultures globally by developing local arts communities through the nurturing of young creatives to reach their full potential in four core values: character, calling, craft, and community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Carpe academy provides artistic training and leadership development through award-winning camps, ongoing classes, and private instruction using interactive teaching methods in visual arts, music, and theater. With our focus on these core values character, craft, calling and community carpe artista seeks to assist creatives in reaching their full potential. Newly in development, the academy program has been expanded by adding a branch of career training called c3t carpe creative career training. Carpe artista will partner with the rutherford county school board, to pilot this program. C3t will provide students with opportunities to earn cte certifications that will prepare them for future career development in the arts. Plans include partnering with the Tennessee state education department to solidify the programs inclusion in Tennessee state schools.approximately 400 students benefited in 2022.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.9%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.86; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.9% of revenue deployed · 89.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $626K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.