Carolinas Society of Endocrinologists

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
562052603
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Raleigh, NC, USA
Phone
9198333836
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$178,841
Expenses
$167,303
Assets
$94,435
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • W ALAN SKIPPER CAE (SENIOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ASHLEY NEWTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • JOSEPH A ALOI MD FACE (PRESIDENT)
  • RAYMOND B STADIEM MD MPH (VICE PRESIDENT/ PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • EVELINE A WARING MD (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • W ALAN SKIPPER CAE (SENIOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ASHLEY NEWTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • JOSEPH A ALOI MD FACE (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the carolinas society of clinical endocrinologists (csce) is to bring into one federated organization the endocrinologists of North Carolina and South Carolina so that they may interact for the purposes of professional education and advocate for quality patient care and the medical profession.

What it reported doing in 2024

The csce annual meeting provides an opportunity each year for carolina-based endocrinologists to attend continuing medical education sessions and network with colleagues from across the region.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.6%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 71.2%; rating input score 71

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.5%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.6%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.6% of revenue deployed · 71.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $119K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.