Carolina Roller Derby Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861130911
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Apex, NC, USA
Phone
9192366969
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,078
Expenses
$27,947
Assets
$62,587
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jamie Roessner (President)
  • Adam Weinbaum (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Jamie Roessner (President)
  • Logan Barcus (Treasurer)
  • Adam Weinbaum (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To enrich lives through roller derby by offering athletic training, competitive opportunities, and community outreach in a family-friendly, inclusive environment.

What it reported doing in 2024

Training: Organized two new skater training programs in the spring and fall, introducing 24 new skaters to the sport. Held an all-day skills clinic led by a veteran skater to support ongoing development for league members. This grew league membership and improved retention, resulting in a 37% increase in membership revenue.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 15
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 10%; rating input score 10
  • Program expense ratio: 23.6%; rating input score 24

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57.7%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.24; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 10% of revenue deployed · 23.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.