Carolina Meadows Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 825385916
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9199424014
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,204,111
- Expenses
- $553,660
- Assets
- $2,892,448
- Liabilities
- $8,320
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEVIN MCLEOD (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- GARY LEVINE (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CFO)
Highest reported compensation
- KEVIN MCLEOD (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $485,562 total reported compensation
- GARY LEVINE (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CFO): $304,576 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To solicit and receive gifts, grants, bequests and contributions for the support of carolina meadows, inc. In order to enhance or extend its mission, programs, services, and facilities.
What it reported doing in 2024
The mission of carolina meadows foundation, inc. Is to solicit and receive gifts, grants, bequests and contributions for the support of carolina meadows, inc. (cmi) in order to enhance or extend its mission, programs, services, and facilities.the foundation continues to collect funds, sharpen messages, and broaden its reach to the carolina meadows community using donorperfect donor management system, speaking engagements, and monthly newsletter submissions. Fundraising is primarily to solicit, accept and acquire by gift, devise, bequest or otherwise, donations of money and property for the support and maintenance of carolina meadows, inc. And to hold, (continued on schedule o)manage, administer, use, and invest such money or property.the foundation accepts donations for specific funds that enhance the community through its programming, amenities, and funds for employees or residents facing financial hardship. In 2024, gifts to the foundation supported the following community enhancement projects that would otherwise not have been funded through cmi operating funds: installation of solar panels on cmi's plant operations buildingpurchase of an ev wheelchair accessible van for transporting residents and installation of two ev charging stations for residents, employees, or guests. Expansion and installation of a ramp to cmi's auditorium stagepurchase of portable sounds systems for cmi's apartment buildings for use at resident precinct meetings and other large gatherings that necessitate the use of a microphonethe employee emergency assistance fund supports employees with unexpected critical expenses that affect their ability to work. In 2024, eleven employees received essential support through this program. These financial awards were made directly to businesses/vendors to cover employee expenses related to housing, utilities, and transportation costs.to encourage a culture of philanthropy on campus with a particular focus on planned giving, the foundation launched its legacy leaders program in late 2023 to recognize donors who designate the foundation as a beneficiary or in their estate, trust or will at a particular giving level. The resulting momentum for planned giving encouraged the foundation to discuss donor naming opportunities for cmi's new skilled nursing facility that is currently under construction.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 96.7%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.1%; rating input score 97; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 54%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.22; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45.5% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56% of revenue deployed · 96.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $535K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $486K · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.