Carolina Family Plannning Centers

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270566343
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2012
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Hartsville, SC, USA
Phone
8433071552
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Planning Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$41,327
Expenses
$62,865
Assets
$25,854

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We plan to actively increase the number of families who benefit from family planning services by partnering with local chruches, faith-based medical clinics and volunteers.

What it reported doing in 2012

Free pregnancy testing, counseling to both men and women, abstinence education, and parenting skills.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.9%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 34.7%; rating input score 35

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -52.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 100% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.8% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -57.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.9% of revenue deployed · 34.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.