Carolina Correctional Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
561931588
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Cary, NC, USA
Phone
9197549422
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Rehabilitation Services for Offenders

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$253,670
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • QUON BRIDGES (DIRECTOR)
  • MITCHELL BROWN (DIRECTOR)
  • ROBERT L FARMER (CHAIRMAN)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

It is the mission of the wake electronic monitoring program (wem) to provide for community-based supervision of 1) criminal defendants released on bond pending a court date or 2) non-compliant individuals ordered onto monitoring for the purpose of enforcing/enhancing their fulfillment of child support obligations. The removal of eligible defendants and delinquent payers of child support from the wake county detention centers is beneficial in that it: alleviates overcrowding; reserves bed space for individuals charged with violent offenses; reduces demands for jail expansion and new construction; and it encourage participants to remain productive citizens pending their return to court.

What it reported doing in 2019

In recent years wake county contracted with carolina correctional services (ccs) for 78 units/slots, however required ccs to have a self-pay component for defendants who are eligible but have not yet migrated down into county contracted slots. This allowed for the gps monitoring of more than 78 eligible defendants at any one time thereby allowing the county to reduce its actual daily rate paid for the overall monitoring service benefit. Ccs managed and operated a turn-key service for the county which included staffing for both field work and a court liaison positions. In may 2018 ccs management and the county found themselves at an impasse as to an appropriate funding structure for continued monitoring services. Ccs determined it was not in its financial interest to renew its relationship with the county. Ccs did agree, however, to continue providing monitoring services through september 30, 2018 to allow the county to find another service provider.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -42.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -27.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.