Carmella Rose Health Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 202815662
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Solon, OH, USA
- Phone
- 2166586025
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $287,077
- Expenses
- $265,718
- Assets
- $419,652
- Liabilities
- $2,156
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- GRACE WRIGHT (INCOMING EXE): $59,593 total reported compensation
- VIRGINIA PATE (EXECUTIVE DI): $50,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Carmella rose health foundation's mission is to positively impact our community by connecting the underserved population to medical and social resources, eliminating barriers, and helping individuals navigate through their health care journey.
What it reported doing in 2025
-during the reporting year, the carmella rose health foundation provided comprehensive, community based care coordination to 466 unique individuals, connecting them to critical health and social services across cuyahoga county. In addition to those formally enrolled, the hub delivered 321 additional services to community members who were not hub eligible, ensuring that no one seeking help was turned away without support. Chws played a central role in improving access to essential benefits and healthcare. Crhf chws facilitated 135 medicaid enrollments and 294 snap enrollments, helping families stabilize coverage, increase food security, and reduce financial strain. To strengthen access to medical care, chws coordinated 207 confirmed medical appointments and 44 confirmed dental appointments, reducing barriers that often prevent timely preventive and follow up care. Addressing social determinants of health remained a core focus. Chws completed 285 successful social service referrals, connecting participants to housing supports, utilities assistance, transportation resources, behavioral health services, and other community programs that directly impact health outcomes. Together, these activities reflect crhf's commitment to reducing disparities, improving care access, and supporting whole person health for residents across the region.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 96.6%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: $40.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.58; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 41.2%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.6% of revenue deployed · 96.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $257K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.