Caring Partners International Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 371028228
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Franklin, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9377432744
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,326,205
- Expenses
- $13,953,884
- Assets
- $3,523,191
- Liabilities
- $8,754
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ADAM G REED DC (PRESIDENT &)
Highest reported compensation
- ADAM G REED DC (PRESIDENT &): $140,550 total reported compensation
- RICHARD J LALLI (SECRETARY &): $22,075 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing medical supplies, medications, treatment, and nutritional care to churches, missionaries, and mission agencies to assist in caring for the physical and spiritual needs of individuals throughout the world.
What it reported doing in 2025
Providing medical supplies, medications, treatment, and nutritional care to churches, missionaries, and mission agencies to assist in caring for the physical and spiritual needs of individuals throughout the world including the USA, guatamala, thailand, belize, togo, ukraine, kenya, nigeria and ghana.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.3%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 98.8%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: $304.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Pass
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.3% of revenue deployed · 98.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $141K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 31 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 36 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 34 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.