Caring Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222178791
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Atlantic City, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6094847050
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,559,781
- Expenses
- $35,450,417
- Assets
- $72,003,069
- Liabilities
- $48,874,781
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Joseph Dougherty Esq (Pres and Exec Director Ope): $773,633 total reported compensation
- Brian P Curran (VP and Exec Director Finan): $684,540 total reported compensation
- Thomas Thompson (Controller): $444,872 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to communicate the love and work of Jesus Christ Our Lord for all peoples through serving the frail, impaired aged and disabled young adults. These ministries reach out to accomplish the following for as many in need as possible: Prevent institutional placement by providing community-based alternatives. Provide respite and support for families and other care givers. Present a "today-worth-the-living" to the frail and impaired elderly, and disabled young adults.
What it reported doing in 2024
CARING is licensed by the NJ Department of Health and Senior Services to provide Assisted Living Program (ALP) services -nursing care, homemaker services, personal care, assistance with medication, doctor appointments and transportation to residents of publicly subsidized units in their own apartments. Currently, CARING provides ALP services to eligible residents of the Atlantic City Housing Authority Jefferies Tower, Inlet Tower and John P Whittington Center, The Best of Life building in Atlantic City, the Wildwood Housing Authority Sandman Towers, Millville Housing Authority Riverview West, East and Jaycee Plaza and Camden's Northgate II. CARING provides those residents with the services they require to "age in place" rather than move into a long-term care facility.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 88% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 70% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -72.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.03; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.68; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $30.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $774K · 11 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $2.3M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.