Caring for Military Families the Elizabeth Dole Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454292692
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2022497170
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,221,551
- Expenses
- $8,605,972
- Assets
- $14,332,147
- Liabilities
- $4,038,464
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE SCHWAB (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVE SCHWAB (CEO): $334,007 total reported compensation
- ELIZABETH FIELD (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $245,445 total reported compensation
- PAVEL J SULLIVAN (SR VP, FIN. & ADMINISTRATION): $204,133 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Elizabeth Dole Foundation's mission is to empower military and veteran caregivers, their families, and their communities through programs, partnerships, and advocacy that drive innovation and sustainable solutions.
What it reported doing in 2024
Outreach & Awareness: The Foundation's Outreach and Awareness initiatives help bring the stories, service, and sacrifice of America's military and veteran caregivers and their families to light. Too often, the family, loved ones, and friends of our nation's wounded and ill service members and veterans do not know that they have taken on a new role - that of caregiver. This can exacerbate the challenges caregivers face and often leaves caregivers feeling isolated, misunderstood, and alone. Our outreach and awareness efforts help caregivers recognize this new role that they have assumed. Self-identification is the first step to accessing programs and finding a community that understands and can offer support. The Hidden Helpers initiative supports children, youth, and young adults up to age 18 who are involved in caring for wounded, ill, or aging service members or veterans. Through collaboration with nonprofit, corporate, and government partners, the Hidden Helpers program aims to create a positive collective impact for military-connected youth caregivers and their families. The subject of military children - and the impact of caregiving on their development and growth - has revealed itself to be a pressing issue on the minds of support organizations, military leaders, policymakers, and military families themselves. The Foundation is working to fill this gap through research and programming on (1) how military children are affected by a family member with a combat injury or illness, (2) how military children are affected by taking on caregiving duties themselves, and (3) what interventions or programs can best support the children of caregivers. -The Foundation's annual Heroes and History Makers Gala focuses on the stories of nation's military and veteran caregivers. This national event also features successes from the broad scope of the Foundation's annual programming and creates opportunities for caregivers to build connections with one another. -The Face The Fight initiative is a coalition effort led by USAA and organized by the Foundation to raise awareness and support for veteran suicide prevention, aiming to halve the veteran suicide rate by 2030 through strategies such as safe firearm storage, equitable care access, and support for at-risk veterans. -The Elizabeth Dole Foundation National Cabinet is a donor initiative to bring change-makers with the experience, talent, and determination to solve the challenges facing America's military and veteran caregivers. Members of this National Cabinet have a deep sense of appreciation for the nation and feel a sense of duty and commitment to support the wounded and ill veterans, their caregivers, and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.2%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 76.8%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.52 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.5%; rating input score 98; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.7%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.67; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.2%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.2% of revenue deployed · 76.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 20 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $6.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $334K · 26 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.