Caring Community Cuisine
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993591460
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Kennebunkport, ME, USA
- Phone
- 2072040707
- Rating
- 35
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $33,511
- Expenses
- $31,081
- Assets
- $2,430
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JONATHAN CARTWRIGHT (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- SELENA ROY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- JONATHAN CARTWRIGHT (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- BEN FRASER (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER)
- LESLIE CARGILL (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Caring community cuisine's mission is to provide family nutrition and human interaction to help those battling cancer. Our goal is to help patients and families dealing with cancer with circular care in mind. Nutritional guidance, meal production, and culinary organization will alleviate daily stresses so the patient can focus on becoming well. We hope to provide education on healthy living for prevention and if necessary, treatment of cancer. We believe healing is also attained through human interaction and support. We feel dining with others battling the same disease will help to gain strength and compassion for one another.
What it reported doing in 2024
Weekly menu and meal preparation for families. Cooking classes. During the year the organization prepared 180 meals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.