Cares Ng Development Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463767944
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2028337315
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$200,000
Expenses
$202,060
Assets
$215,546
Liabilities
$114,312

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

People named in this filing

  • BRIAN MARABLE (DIRECTOR)
  • DANIELLE HINZ (DIRECTOR)
  • ED SCOLLON (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To disseminate scientific information & methodologies related to quantitative human health chemical risk analysis for the public, to support and facilitate public/private stakeholder and regulatory agency risk management decision-making, based on sound science.

What it reported doing in 2024

Cares ng development organization was originally developed in 2001 as a population, calendar-based, probabilistic model for estimating aggregate and cumulative exposure and risk across multiple routes: food, water, and residential for pesticides. The model is undergoing significant upgrades to meet current and future needs:- move from pc-based to cloud-based system for easier updates.- streamline the assessment process.- update consumption, residue monitoring, and behavioral databases.- revise the residential sop algorithms to reflect current epa guidelines.- enable minute by minute exposure estimates for all routes of exposure with results that can be exported to physiologically based pharmacokinetic (pbpk) models.- create a flexible model that can accommodate low- to high-tier assessments.the goal of this next generation of cares (cares ng) is to advance aggregate and cumulative exposure and risk modeling methods and capabilities for the benefit of the scientific, regulatory, and public interest communities. Cares ng will be available for public use.membership in the cares ng development organization is open to any task force, joint venture or consortium of chemical producers or pesticide registrants or any individual chemical producer (including processor) or pesticide registrant who desires to support development of the next generation of cares (cares ng).the development of cares ng is coordinated through its technical advisory group (tag). The tag membership is open to technical experts from pesticide registrants, government agencies, members of academia, non-governmental organizations, and contract research organizations. No financial contribution is necessary to be a member of the tag.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.7% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $156K reported
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.