Caregiver Coalition Fund of America Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
825456471
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Copiague, NY, USA
Phone
6316080598
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,337
Expenses
$4,352
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$8

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EDWARD F GIBBONS JR (PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN F WAYNE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • EDWARD F GIBBONS JR (PRESIDENT)
  • FRANK M CORSO JR (DIRECTOR)
  • NICHOLAS MARINO (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission is devoted to supporting the physical, psychological, emotional, spiritual and socioeconomic wellbeing of caregivers through the establishment of community and corporate care partnerships. Through these collaborative efforts carecfa promotes the provisioning of resources to caregivers and their retention in the workforce. A commitment to scholarship and the enhancement of the caregiver knowledge base is central to fostering caregiver cultures. Through scholary endeavors carecfa promotes innovation in its efforts to enrich the everday lives of caregivers and their care recipients. In all operational and community-based activities, the caregiver coalition fund of america is committed to the ideals inherent in its care pillars of excellence: compassion, resilience and empowerment.

What it reported doing in 2024

The vision of caregiver coalition fund of america is ensure all family caregivers have access to the resources they need to fulfull their roles as caregivers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.