Career Path Services Employment and Training
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911032846
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Spokane, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5093267520
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Job Training
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $26,462,263
- Expenses
- $26,261,553
- Assets
- $4,741,180
- Liabilities
- $1,758,835
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CAMI EAKINS (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- KAYCI LOFTUS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KELLI ELLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- AMY TROSINE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- RON POPLAWSKI (CFO/VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CAMI EAKINS (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $328,507 total reported compensation
- ANDY DWONCH (COO): $230,228 total reported compensation
- KAYCI LOFTUS (VICE PRESIDENT): $146,980 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Career path services is a workforce development and human services nonprofit corporation.
What it reported doing in 2024
Quest - the goal the quest dwg is to enable individuals who have been adversely affected by the covid-19 pandemic and the social and economic inequities that the pandemic exacerbated, to enter, return to, or advance in high-quality jobs in growth industries. State ecsa and federal ecsa - economic security for all (ecsa) is a poverty reduction program that supports low-income washingtonians in their pursuit of equity, dignity, and sustained self-sufficiency. The program is designed to coordinate existing systems through intensive program navigation, local innovation, and flexible support that fills gaps and meet needs within existing programs and regulations. The service model relies on a local coordination team, responsible for providing the following services: bundling multiple benefits to stabilize customers' households, creating career plans for customers to reach a self-sufficiency earnings goal, coordinating wrap-around support across programs to fill gaps in benefits, connections to training or education, with financial support to cover living expenses and supporting customers until they achieve self-sufficiency. Basic food employment and training - the basic food employment and training program is Washington state's supplemental nutrition assistance program employment and training program. Bfet provides education, employment and training services to basic food recipients not participating in the state's temporary assistance for needy families or refugee cash assistance programs. Bfet is an important part of the state's comprehensive workforce development system and plays a vital role in Washington's two-generation approach, reducing poverty and increasing prosperity for families. Bfet assists basic food recipients to achieve their human potential by encouraging economic well-being through skill acquisition, education and gainful employment. Bfet activities include job search training, supervised job search assistance, educational services, vocational education and skills training. The program also offers case management in all activities, job retention services and wraparound supports such as transportation and child care to facilitate successful program completion. Bankwork/careerwork - career path services' careerwork medical and bankwork programming, prepares job seekers for entry-level, non-clinical positions or entrance into financial service roles as a first step to career success in the healthcare and banking industries. Our training meets the growing demand for healthcare and banking positions, better positioning graduates for job retention and benefits, leading to direct hiring event at conclusion of the course. Participants benefit from learning role-specific skills and discipline for a lasting career
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 49% for direct work, and 51% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 87.7%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $322.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.8%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.1% of revenue deployed · 87.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $23M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $329K · 22 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.