Care Transitions Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465428185
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8019224800
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $462,067
- Expenses
- $103,935
- Assets
- $1,635,019
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EDDIE KEELE (CEO)
- BRENDA BARTHOLOMEW (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- EDDIE KEELE (CEO): $589,104 total reported compensation
- BRENDA BARTHOLOMEW (CEO): $304,663 total reported compensation
- BRIAN MURRAY (CFO): $198,282 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is operating exclusively for charitable, scientific, literary or educational purposes, all within the meaning of section 501 (c) (3) of the internal revenue code. See part iii, line 4a for additional information.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of its members: mission health services, a Utah nonprofit corporation, gunnison valley hospital special services district, a body corporate and politic of the state of Utah, aka gunnison valley hospital, aka gunnison valley service district, and any additional or successor member of the organization that qualifies as a publicly supported organization under section 509(a)(1) or section 509(a) (2) of the internal revenue code. The organization owns a 62bed skilled nursing and assisted living facility located in centerfield, Utah, which is leased to gunnison valley hospital special services district. The facility operates under the names mission at community living rehabilitation and mission at community assisted living center.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 23
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22.4%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 77.5%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.73; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 132%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 22.4% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $104K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $589K · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.