Care Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341748776
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Cleveland, OH, USA
- Phone
- 2167816228
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Homeless Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,457,694
- Expenses
- $13,178,594
- Assets
- $13,266,859
- Liabilities
- $1,222,500
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KENNETH GRIFFIN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- MONIQUE WILLIAMS (DIRECTOR OF CLINICAL SERVICES): $159,751 total reported compensation
- CHINEZE ENWONWU (CHIEF DENTAL OFFICER): $156,634 total reported compensation
- DAVID SIEGEL (CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER): $143,397 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To transform lives by providing exceptional, accessible, and compassionate healthcare experiences for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
Health care for the homeless: care alliance health center was established in 1985 as one of the original robert wood johnson foundation health care for the homeless projects in the nation and in 1993 became an independent nonprofit organization. Today, care alliance continues its focus on providing health care to those experiencing homelessness in the city of cleveland as a federally qualified health center receiving funding through the u.s. Department of health resources and services administration (hrsa). After more than forty years of providing health care to the homeless population, care alliance has built a strong rapport with this population as well as developing tremendous respect as an integral member of the local delivery system of safety-net providers. The health care for the homeless program offers primary health care and supportive services at all three of care alliance's primary clinic locations as well as at outreach sites throughout the city where people who are homeless tend to congregate. Comprehensive dental, optometry and behavioral health services are provided at our main clinic. Individuals and families experiencing homelessness have unique health care needs. They are at high-risk of contracting or exacerbating serious health conditions as a result of prolonged exposure to severe weather and reduced access to health care. As a result, individuals are often treated at later stages of disease and have higher mortality and chronic morbidity than individuals with access to consistent health care. At our outreach clinics, we see many patients who have chronic illnesses and acute health issues. In an attempt to reach a greater number of homeless persons who may not be connected through safety net services, care alliance has established collaborative agreements with various locations throughout the community where homeless individuals tend to congregate so that they may provide medical and supportive care. These outreach locations include: norma herr women's shelter. Bishop cosgrove, and others. Through our outreach program, care alliance is able to offer clinics throughout the city of cleveland where individuals experiencing homelessness may meet to obtain a meal, social services, a shower, or shelter. In 2015, care alliance launched a mobile clinic program to serve chronically homeless individuals living in permanent supportive housing. By providing these services in environments where these individuals are comfortable, our outreach staff are better able to engage patients into care with the long-term goal of bringing them into one of our primary clinics to obtain the full scope of comprehensive services needed to transition from homelessness into stable housing. Clients served = 2,001.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.1%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 77.3%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $38.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.1% of revenue deployed · 77.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $160K · 20 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.