Cardinal Girls Lacrosse Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271466477
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Dunn Loring, VA, USA
Phone
5712215988
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$150
Expenses
$192,120
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM SENICH (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WILLIAM SENICH (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTINA PISANI (TREASURER)
  • BETSY ANGEL-KIMENER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote participation and competition in girls lacrosse and related athletic endeavors.

What it reported doing in 2020

Provide opportunities for athletes to participate in area, regional and national lacrosse tournaments; develope player skills by coordinating practices and instructional sessions with skilled coaches; to assist players and their parents in evaluating post-high school lacrosse options and to develope leadership skills, good sportsmanship and a love of the game of lacrosse.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -127,980%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -84% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -49.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -33.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.