Car Caring Advocacy Respect
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943357111
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2011
- Location
- Long Beach, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5624372379
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,116
- Expenses
- $123,553
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific purpose of this corporation is to maintain, foster, and provide advocacy services for the education, vocational training, counseling, and care of people with mental retardation and other developmental disabilities or neurologically handicapping conditions closely related to mental retardation in settings that are appropriate to meet their individual needs and that have been agreed upon by their families.
What it reported doing in 2011
1. To promote the general welfare of persons with mental retardation of all ages in the State of California: at home, in communities, and in public, private, and religious schools and developmental centers; to advocate that all public and private programs protect the rights of persons with mental retardation and seek improvement in the quantity and quality of these programs;2. To further research on all aspects of mental retardation such as cause and prevention, medical and social treatment, and methods of special education and training;3. To develop a better understanding of mental retardation on the part of the public, and to cooperate with all public, private, and religious agencies (international, federal, state and local) and departments of Developmental Services, Education, Health Services, Rehabilitation and Social Service;4. To establish local units of parents and friends of persons with mental retardation throughout the state and to advise, assist, guide and coordinate the activities of these units;5. The Association shall attempt to influence legislation to the extent sanctioned by federal and state statutes and regulations; and in addition, shall share its expertise in the area of mental retardation when requested to do so by legislators and/or administrators; but at no time shall the Association participate or intervene - directly or indirectly - in any political campaign on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate for public office.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 1
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2,901.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.