Captain Community Human Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141637304
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Glenville, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5183994624
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,411,954
- Expenses
- $4,041,949
- Assets
- $6,524,060
- Liabilities
- $730,871
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREW GILPIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- CLAIRE BROWN (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- KATE GURLEY (PAST PRESIDENT)
- MIKE HOLLEY (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOHN KUZNIA (PRESIDENT)
- KATHY SIMMONDS (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ANDREW GILPIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $108,387 total reported compensation
- MAGDY HAY (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $78,630 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Please see statement for part 1, line 1, above.
What it reported doing in 2025
Youth shelter/outreach: the captain chs street outreach project is a unique and compelling program thats supports atrisk youth in our community. Our specialized, dedicated team build rapport and relationships with youth who are homeless or at risk of becoming homelessthroughout saratoga, fulton, montgomery, Washington, and warren counties. The captain chs runaway and homess youth shelter is a temporary shelter certified by the nys office of children and family services serving youth ages 1317 who are homeless, runaway, or in an otherwise unsafe situation. Youth can utilize our program and services for up to 30 days or as long as is necessary, and know that they will be safe and find refuge in a homelike environment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 81% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 97
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.5%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 75.1%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.5%; rating input score 95; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.3%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.61; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.5% of revenue deployed · 75.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 22 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $108K · 24 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.