Capitol Squash Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272791355
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Hartford, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8605952634
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $785,696
- Expenses
- $758,125
- Assets
- $2,890,682
- Liabilities
- $66,330
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Meg Taylor (Executive Dir.): $154,782 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To empower the youth of Hartford to reach their potential as athletes, scholars, and engaged citizens.
What it reported doing in 2024
The mission of Capitol Squash is to empower youth of Hartford to reach their potential as athletes, students, and engaged citizens. Capitol Squash strives to provide youth with life-changing opportunities through the sport of squash, intensive educational support, mentoring, and community service activities. This past year, Capitol Squash expanded our reach and deepened our impact.Over the course of the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2025, we served 50 3rd-12th grade students and 19 post-secondary students. Students attended programming after school 2-4 days a week. We had 2,149 total program hours with the average individual participant attending 428 hours of programming. Students engaged in an hour of squash training followed by an hour of academic tutoring.Our students participated in academic enrichment ranging from debates and geography workshops to vocabulary competitions. They also attended memorable field trips to the Hartford Public Library, Auerfarm, Hartford Stitch, and Yale Peabody Museum. Our students conducted community service at the Hungerford Nature Center.Students across middle and high school engaged deeply in the college and post-secondary process. They participated in weekly workshops, visited 13 college campuses including Boston University, Central Connecticut State University, Mount Holyoke College, and UConn Storrs, and met directly with university admissions leaders. 100% of the students who graduated high school in FY25 have matriculated at college. They are attending American University, Bowdoin College, Central Connecticut State University, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Trinity College, and UConn Hartford. This year, the total amount of money Capitol Squash students secured in financial aid and scholarships rose to $3.8 million.Expenses $478,507.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.9%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 63.1%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.5%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.81; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.4%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.9% of revenue deployed · 63.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $479K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $155K · 25 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.