Capital University
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 314379435
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Columbus, OH, US
- Phone
- (614) 236-6196
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- University or Technological Institute
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $121,510,087
- Expenses
- $126,329,426
- Assets
- $297,917,364
- Liabilities
- $57,252,150
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
34 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID KAUFMAN (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID KAUFMAN (PRESIDENT): $416,904 total reported compensation
- REYNALDO VALENCIA (DEAN OF LAW SCHOOL): $308,396 total reported compensation
- WILLIAM MEA (VP-BUSINESS&FIN./TREASURER): $297,406 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Capital University does not have a single mission statement on the provided pages, but the tagline 'Ask. Think. Lead.' is prominently displayed.
What it reported doing in 2024
Capital university provides academic opportunities to 1,609 undergraduate and 654 graduate and professional students. The university offers four undergraduate degrees with more than 70 majors, and graduate degrees in law, business, nursing, music, education, and theology taught by approximately 131 full-time faculty. More than 1,551 undergraduate and 559 graduate and professional students receive institutional financial assistance in the form of scholarships and grants. Since capital is in a metropolitan setting in the columbus surburb of bexley, students enjoy many academic, cultural, recreational and social activities. In addition to the graduate programs housed on the main campus in bexley, the capital university law school is located in downtown columbus providing students the prospect of enhancing their education through internships and opportunities with federal, state, and county agencies and with law firms in Ohio's capital city. The academic experience at capital includes a rich variety of internships and educational opportunities for students with national corporations, health, and other non-profit agencies and governmental offices.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.2%; rating input score 95; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.36; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.5%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 21 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $114.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $417K · 34 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $10.4M reported
- Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
- Schedules: 12 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.