Capital Region Theological Center

Legal name: Capital Region Theological Ctr Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300158152
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2018
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Clifton Park, NY, USA
Phone
5184622470
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Interfaith Coalitions
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$254
Expenses
$4,328
Assets
$57,734

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID PREISINGER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID PREISINGER (PRESIDENT)
  • WILLIAM GROSCH (VICE PRESIDE)
  • DEANNE BELLINGER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

CRTC believes healthy congregations create healthy communities.

What it reported doing in 2018

To provide assistance to churches and nonprofit organizations in developing resources and also to provide theological education for laity and continuing education for clergy. Primary project activities are performing local resource discovery and cataloging, identifying categories and possible inquiries, developing a data management tool, recruiting staff people and contractors, to perform needed work, training all staff on resourcing processes and tools developing grant making capability and capacity, marketing the new services to all constituents and stakeholders and developing fundraising capacity to take crtc beyound current donation levels to a level of sustainability.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,603.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.34; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -48.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -62.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.