Capital Area Suburban Exchange

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
010971360
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Boards of Trade

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$111,175
Expenses
$99,289
Assets
$38,357

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Trent Rush (President)
  • Tira Jones Holcomb (Immediate Past President)
  • Millery Ingallina (Executive Director)
  • Mindy Martinez (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Trent Rush (President)
  • Linda Hubble (Treasurer)
  • Donna Howe (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Facilitate networking among utility districts consultants

What it reported doing in 2025

Annual Summer Conference - Presented seminars over a 3 day period providing 120 attendees with educational and informative updates on various topical issues concering Municipal Utility and Special Districts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.5%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 59.9%; rating input score 60

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.7%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.5% of revenue deployed · 59.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $59K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.