Capital Area Partnership Upliftingpeople Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 540788796
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
- Location
- Richmond, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8047880050
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,973,672
- Expenses
- $1,943,954
- Assets
- $1,785,808
- Liabilities
- $170,160
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL RODGERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL RODGERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $52,977 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of capup is to replace poverty with stability and hope.
What it reported doing in 2024
Federal community service block grant: community organization - brought people together to improve conditions to improve the living conditions of those in the community. Community improvement - develop facilities that support citizens in their day-to-day lives, such as senior centers, transportation for seniors and those without transportation in need of self-sufficiency. Economic enhancement & utilization - create new uses for resources within the community to enhance income and personal well-being. Support adult education efforts. Provide emergency services. Provide seniors and the disabled with assistance in managing their lives and maintaining a sense of independence.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.7%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 81.6%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $31.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 78.6%; rating input score 79; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.6%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.7% of revenue deployed · 81.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $53K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 22 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D expense reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D revenue reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.