Cape Cod Pro-Life Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990865896
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Harwich, MA, United States
- Phone
- 774-237-0211
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,782
- Expenses
- $50,693
- Assets
- $38,350
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Joseph Meeks (C0-President)
- Ellen d'Ovidio (Co- president)
People named in this filing
- Joseph Meeks (C0-President)
- Ellen d'Ovidio (Co- president)
- Joseph Kane (Tr)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Cape Cod Pro-Life Alliance is dedicated to helping the most vulnerable among us; pregnant and parenting moms in need, the elderly and the disabled. Every woman who is pregnant, whether expected or unexpected, deserves the love and support needed to nurture her baby while in the womb and after birth. The Commitment of Our Members The Alliance is a Christian pro-life advocacy group formed in April 2023. We have over 300 members (and growing) from 28 churches and Christian organizations on Cape Cod and the mainland side of the canal. We assist life-affirming organizations that provide women with the love and support they need to choose life for their babies and raise their child, or through adoption, give the gift of life to another couple. We seek to form youth to respect life. We endeavor to change the hearts and minds of persons who attach little or no value to pre-born babies...
What it reported doing in 2025
Presentation on current information of the large percentage of harmful effects of the so called abortion pills not only to the unborn in the womb but to the mothers health as well.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 8
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.9%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 9
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.3%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -166.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 61.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 6.9% of revenue deployed · 9.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $5K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.