Cape Cod & Islands Council Inc Boy Scouts of America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042141816
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Yarmouth Port, MA, USA
- Phone
- 5083624322
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $639,240
- Expenses
- $698,225
- Assets
- $6,280,041
- Liabilities
- $682,587
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARSHALL LOVELETTE (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- AMY PAYNE ZAHN (SCOUT EXEC/C): $100,128 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promotion of scouting on cape cod and the islands
What it reported doing in 2025
It is the mission of the boy scouts of america, to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes, by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. Cape cod and islands council fulfills this mission by making the programs of cub scouting, scouts bsa, venturing, sea scouting, and learning for life/exploring available to community organizations within its territory to use as their programs. The council presently serves over 711 young people in 43 cub scout packs, scouts bsa troops, venture crews, sea scout ships, and explorer posts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 81.9%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.2%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.99; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 81.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 23 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $572K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 23 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.