Cap Ministries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 612023169
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Poolville, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8173127471
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $212,905
- Expenses
- $137,677
- Assets
- $114,809
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gregory Adams (President)
- Dedra Vick (Vice-President / Treasurer)
Highest reported compensation
- Gregory Adams (President): $108,194 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
C.A.P. Ministries exists to serve Peace Officers, Public Officials and Public Servants by investing into their lives through genuine care, practical assistance, and faithful proclamation of God's Word.
What it reported doing in 2025
This amount went to the housing and benefit package for the President and Director of C.A.P. Ministries, Gregory Adams. His salary was derived from personal retirement investments. This housing and benefit package enabled Gregory to devote full- time to the ministry. In calendar year 2025 Gregory spent approximately 576 hours with 48 deputies in "ride-along" time as a volunteer chaplain for the Parker County Sheriff's Office. This time allows the deputies to get to know Greg and vice-versa, introducing the deputies to the spiritual and practical assistance that are available to them through C.A.P. Ministries. Greg has served the Sheriff's Office in critical incident scenarios giving practical assistance to those on scene. Being full-time also allowed Gregory to develop, study, and teach three Bible Studies for county and city public officials and senior staff. Currently Greg has Bible studies for the employees for Parker County, Precinct Two, the city council and senior staff for the city of Springtown, Texas and for the Parker County Commissioners, County Attorney, and Sheriff's Office. Monthly devotionals are also sent to each group electronically including ministry supporters and board members
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.1%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.3%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -26.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.1% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $122K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $108K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.