Cao Dai Temple of Wichita Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453828468
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Wichita, KS, USA
- Phone
- 3162939609
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Buddhism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,010
- Expenses
- $27,227
- Assets
- $74,885
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HAI V NGUYEN (PRESIDENT)
- DANH H VO (EXTERNAL VICE PRESIDENT)
- MINH H LE (INTERNAL VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- HAI V NGUYEN (PRESIDENT)
- TUYEN NGUYEN (SECRETARY)
- DANH H VO (EXTERNAL VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Lunar new year, buddha birthday, vu lan buddhist celebration
What it reported doing in 2024
09/19/2024: buddha birthday celebration.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 28.6%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 48.4%; rating input score 48
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.8%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.75; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.6% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 47.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 28.6% of revenue deployed · 48.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.