Canopy Canopy Canopy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300537058
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2010
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
3475295182
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Printing, Publishing

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$706,944
Expenses
$921,787
Assets
$516,364
Liabilities
$137,178

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSH KLINE (PRESIDENT)
  • SETH STOLBUN (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • EMILY M KLEIMAN (DIRECTOR): $70,538 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule o

What it reported doing in 2024

Core programs digital publishing: tc accomplishes its mission through the publication of an online magazine of visual art and literature, including interactive essays, screen-based artworks, fiction, poetry, prose, and critical dialogues, as well as documentation of public programs and performances. An issue of tc contains 10-15 projects commissioned from artists and writers and is accessible for free via the online platform at canopycanopycanopy.com. Print publishing: the magazine occasionally publishes print publications that make arresting use of the book form.these print objects include multivocal paperbacks which stem from and extend our public programs, as well as single-author works that adapt contributions to the magazine or emerge from specific collaborations with contributors. Public programs: as part of each issue, tc also organizes at least five public programs that are considered to be part of the magazine, including performances, panels, readings, and screenings. Tcs public programs are documented through audio or video and published online in the magazine as videos, audio recordings, and transcripts. Events are often livestreamed. As with digital projects, public program documentation is made accessible to viewers for free at canopycanopycanopy.com. Education: tc has held eight sessions of the publication intensive: a free, annual, two-week summer program in the history and contemporary practice of publication, for twelve higher-level college students, graduate students, and recent college graduates. Each year we invite applications from prospective students with backgrounds in areas such as writing, art, literature, art history, new media, and design. During the program, tc editors lead discussions and workshops with participating students, who research analyze, and develop projects, that hinge on new technologies but also mine the history of print culture and artistic practice. The program takes place at tcs venue and includes visits to studios of artists and designers, archives, and cultural institutions. (due to the pandemic, this program was temporarily suspended in fy21.)

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 59.4%; rating input score 59
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 59.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $547K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $71K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.