Cancer Strongher

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
825252074
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Keller, TX, USA
Phone
8179254810
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$143,656
Expenses
$59,888
Assets
$208,944

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Heidi Slansky (President)
  • Sarah Hamp (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Heidi Slansky (President)
  • Sarah Hamp (Vice President)
  • Laura Church (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Cancer StrongHER is organized to:*Empower female cancer survivors through fitness and active-lifestyle programs giving them a chance to fight back against cancer.*Educate survivors about the benefits of fitness, an active lifestyle, and nutrition through community partnerships.*Offer program services free-of-charge to female survivors of all types of cancer in any community of fighters.*Meet the changing needs of the cancer survivorship community by expanding the program from time to time.

What it reported doing in 2025

Regular fitness programs, 129 classes throughout 2025, 88 participants with 963 attendances logged (yoga, tennis, pickleball, Pilates, resistance workouts, dance, sound baths, etc.)

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 35
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22.7%; rating input score 23
  • Program expense ratio: 54.6%; rating input score 55

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 58.3%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.49; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 53.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 82.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 50.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22.7% of revenue deployed · 54.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.