Cancer Legal Care

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020736402
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Oakdale, MN, USA
Phone
6519179000
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,105,723
Expenses
$1,058,628
Assets
$506,871
Liabilities
$89,382

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LINDY YOKANOVICH ESQ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • LINDY YOKANOVICH ESQ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $181,101 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Cancer legal care's (clc) mission is to engage the law to resolve the complex challenges facing people and communities affected by cancer. Since beginning to provide services to the Minnesota cancer community on october 1, 2007, cancer legal care's various programs have provided over $26 million in free legal care information and/or direct services to nearly 16,000 minnesotans affected by any cancer residing in 80 of Minnesota's 87 counties. Over 6,700 minnesotans have received direct legal care services from clc staff and volunteer attorneys and 9,062 cancer patients, survivors, caregivers, attorneys, and health care providers have attended and learned from one or more of our 293 group education or virtual information presentations.

What it reported doing in 2025

Icare - a significant expansion of our work took place in 2020 with the creation of our icare program under the umbrella of our legal care program offerings. Icare (insurance claim advocacy and resolution) addresses the growing number of health insurance coverage denials due to many factors including shrinking networks and ever-changing pre-authorization requirements. Our goal with icare is to make a significant impact on the health and financial well-being of our clients by way of ensuring that their insurance covers what it should, and that hospital billing and coding errors are corrected so that our clients are not responsible for bills that are not theirs to pay. Since piloting this work in 2019, we have closed 176 complicated insurance matters with a 94% success rate for our clients. Of these closed matters, success included protecting or recovering $4,471,875.94 in health, disability, or life insurance benefits that had initially been denied to 85 of our clients by their insurance company. The individual client dollar amount ranges from $150 to $565,000, with an average recovery/protection of $52,610.31 per client. "your support means the world to me, and i truly couldn't have done it without you.""thank you so much for your support. It truly feels like someone is finally on our side, and my family and i deeply appreciate it.""thank you so much for all you are doing for me. It allows me to focus my energy on getting my health back on track. Don't know how i would handle all this without your help."our icare program provides services to clients on the full spectrum of assistance levels, from educating clients on protections of the law (such as the no surprises act and the Minnesota debt fairness act), explaining benefits and claim determinations, "coaching" clients through their own claim denial appeals, and providing full representation and claim denial appeal and/or medical billing dispute handling. We tackle a wide variety of claim denial and billing issues such as medical necessity, prior authorization, out-of-network, experimental and investigational procedures and medications, off-label medication use, billing coding errors, provider financial assistance, and general navigation of the interplay between medical treatment and the insurance claim process. Our model of providing these services free of charge protects our clients' financial stability by ensuring that they do not have to pay money to recover benefits or keep funds that are rightfully theirs to begin with. In addition to dealing with cancer and the stressors of insurance denials, our icare clients are facing incredible financial strain. Fully 29% of our icare clients are under 200% fpg (up from 24% in 2021), with another 18% in between 200%-300% fpg. All of the icare work is done at no charge and without any income eligibility limitations. Why?1. Very few families could afford an attorney's help in light of cancer's growing financial toxicity.2. Any barrier to reaching out or getting help more often than not becomes a non-starter for people who are at their physical, emotional, and financial breaking point. We know that insurance issues are at the top of the most stressful things our clients face.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.5%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 69.5%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.5% of revenue deployed · 69.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $736K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $181K · 17 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.