Cancer Awareness Prevention & Education Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460867113
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Charlestown, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6175019213
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Voluntary Health Associations & Medical Disciplines N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,711
- Expenses
- $3,240
- Assets
- $5,460
- Liabilities
- $23,318
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROSANNE WALSH (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROSANNE WALSH (PRESIDENT)
- ROSANNE WALSH (TREASURER)
- ROSANNE WALSH (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide and promote the education, awareness and availability of cancer prevention programs and other related services to the community and to engage in and carry on any other activities permitted to a corporation organized under chapter 180 of the Massachusetts general laws, but only to the extent that such activities shall not preclude the classification of the corporation as an organization exempt under sec 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.
What it reported doing in 2019
During the year c.a.p.e. Conducted several meal planning workshops designed to educate young children about healthful food options and the food choices they have besides fast food. Children learn to work with various ingredients and were given a tutorial on how to prepare their own food.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.9%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 62.8%; rating input score 63
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.7%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.69; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.27; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -30.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.9% of revenue deployed · 62.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.