Can Dream Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273065540
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Hanover, MD, USA
Phone
2405358683
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alzheimer's Disease

Reported finances

Revenue
$566
Expenses
$5,778
Assets
$17,882

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JACQUELYN SETH (Director)
  • BRANDY BLAIR (Director)
  • RANDY MORTIS (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Curing alzheimer's now (can) dream foundation is a 501(c)(3) primarily serving Maryland, dc & Virginia with a passion for increasing awareness of alzheimer's disease (ad), especially among african americans. Our hope is to aid removing the stigma of the disease while helping to educate and improve involvement in our community. Our mission is to provide educational outreach to students about ad. Our vision is to ignite student's interest in finding solutions that reduce the burden of alzheimer's on society. Our goals are to: empower students to be active participants in the ad movement; encourage students to be change agents for ad in their community; ignite an increase in the pipeline of students into stem careers or other innovative fields tht would positively impact ad.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our most significant event is the "purple party event." the purpose of this event is to create awareness for alzheimer's. We have had personal experience with this illness/disease and found this a suitable starting point for education and awareness of mental and physical illnesses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -920.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.09; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.