Campus School Parent Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810776891
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Memphis, TN, USA
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $118,281
- Expenses
- $33,731
- Assets
- $219,419
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHANEA MCKINNEY (PRESIDENT)
- KRISTIN RAYFORD (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SHANEA MCKINNEY (PRESIDENT)
- KRISTIN RAYFORD (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BRYCE DEBRUCE (CO-TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To foster a sense of community with the campus school by providing community building events and services for students; promoting parental involvement; providing information and serving as a laiason to parents and students; raising funds to facilitate the operation of campus school.
What it reported doing in 2024
Teacher appreciation events to recognize outstanding service and enhance quality of services provided to students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 75% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 23.8%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 71.5%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.5; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 23.8% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $28K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.