Campaigning for Charities
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272856059
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5052451730
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,388,071
- Expenses
- $916,782
- Assets
- $2,013,789
- Liabilities
- $1,888,172
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GERALD CASTEEL (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CYNDI ANKIEWICZ (EXECUTIVE DI): $9,635 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support and promote philanthropy through a program that is employee- focused, cost efficient and effective in providing all federal employees the opportunity to improve the quality of life for all.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 93% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.8%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 99.5%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: $834.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.94; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.1%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.8% of revenue deployed · 99.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $912K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $10K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 36 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 32 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.