Campagna Academy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
351068483
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Schererville, IN, USA
Phone
8122983201
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Group Homes

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$230,040
Expenses
$887,248
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AL GANDOLFI (PRESIDENT)
  • ELENA DWYRE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • ELENA DWYRE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $107,202 total reported compensation
  • JULIE JACKSON (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $53,136 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide an array of community-based educational treatment and residential services to disadvantaged youth and their families.

What it reported doing in 2023

Residential programs - total revenue $215,651 when government contract revenue required to be reported on line 1e of part viii is included.private secure residential: campagna academy is proud to offer private secure care for young men and women with its 48 bed residence. This state-of-the-art treatment facility resembles an on-campus dorm and includes four on-site classrooms, computer lab, family visitation rooms, fitness center, and therapists' offices. Campagna academy provides treatment with individual, family and group therapy, individualized on-site education, social skills, substance abuse treatment, and anger management training, plus other psycho-educational programs. Residents receive psychiatric services as needed and are continually reassessed for readiness to move to less restrictive living. Open residential care: for over 60 years, open residential programs have been at the heart of what we do. Our life-changing services include: ma level therapists, individualized strength-based treatment plans, step-down living arrangements, individual and family therapy, psycho-educational groups, substance abuse treatment, vocational assessment, independent living skills, on-campus employment, off-campus employment, psychiatric services, and therapeutic recreational programs.intellectual developmental disabilities (idd) residential care: campagna academy's idd program provides highly individualized, structured 24-hour clinical, educational, and psychiatric care for adolescents with full scale iq ranging from 50 to 65 with behavior disorders and who are dually diagnosed with moderate to severe emotional issues and cognitive limitations that challenge both traditional and specialized therapeutic residential treatment. Services are designed and staffed to address a wide range of psychiatric and behavioral diagnoses, while accounting for intellectual and developmental limitations that can often disrupt traditional treatment efforts. Campagna academy utilizes highly individualized, carefully sequenced and closely monitored applied behavior modification systems.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 3
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 69.4%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -285.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 69.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $615K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $107K · 27 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.