Camp Oakhurst Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770499484
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Coarsegold, CA, USA
- Phone
- 559-683-6563
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,215,016
- Expenses
- $1,005,107
- Assets
- $726,489
- Liabilities
- $640,764
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kevin Otsuji (President)
- Jonathan Keene (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Sanford Otsuji (Executive Dir.): $28,727 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a year-round host camp, which means that we provide the place, service, food and some awesome Adventure Activities, and you bring your own program. We can accommodate up to 300 people in the summer, 180 other times. We serve many types of groups such as; Christian organizations including their youth groups, women’s groups, men’s groups, family groups and leadership groups. Our facility is also available to non-profit civic groups, schools, service organizations and special needs groups. We do require that all groups respect our beliefs as outlined in our Statement of Faith, and abide by the rules set forth in the governing guidelines of our contracts.
What it reported doing in 2024
SERVING CAMPERS FOR CHRIST: We are a year-round host camp, that can accommodate up to 300 people. You bring your own material and we provide the service, food and awesome adventure activities! We serve many types of groups such as; Christian organizations including their youth groups, womens groups, mens groups, family groups and leadership groups. Our facility is also available to non-profit civic groups, schools, and service organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 92.5%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.3%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.88; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 92.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $930K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $29K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.