Camp Oak Hill Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521766387
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Nottingham, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7174296878
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $129,524
- Expenses
- $87,567
- Assets
- $127,778
- Liabilities
- $303,480
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Judy Ashburn (President)
- Curtis Ashburn (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Judy Ashburn (President)
- Curtis Ashburn (Executive Director)
- Rebekah Ashburn (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Since its inception in 1988, our charitable mission has been to (1) promote and preserve the legacy and natural resources of historic Camp Oak Hill; (2) provide outdoor recreational activities and opportunities for the appreciation of nature through instructional programs, nature walks, and meditation; (3) provide affordable overnight retreat facilities that create a welcoming environment for the enjoyment of the many diverse individuals, families, and communities represented by our guests; (4) prioritize minority and low-income families, children, youth (ages 14-24), and organizations serving those populations in the Mid-Atlantic region; and (5) subsidize all of these services for at-risk populations through charitable contributions and revenues generated by full-priced rentals of Camp Oak Hill facilities.
What it reported doing in 2025
XxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMid-Atlantic region. We hosted a total of 40 groups (14% increase) with a total of 1,097 guests (45% increase) in 2025. Of these 40 groups, 29 (72%) groups with a total of 759 guests (51% increase) met our primary tax-exempt purpose of serving at-risk populations. These populations accounted for 69% (759) of our guests, and these groups received at least a 40% discount on pricing. This significant subsidy either made a group's camp experience possible or allowed them to bring more campers. Examples are 4-day camps for teenage boys and another for teenage girls from an organization in Baltimore, MD, a Delaware 4-H Club, a Yeshiva school retreat, and a church youth retreat for low-income families. The 11 groups that paid full price plus charitable donations accounted for more than 50% of our revenues, allowing us to subsidize the children, youth, and family camps that are the focus of our nonprofit mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.2%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.4%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.38; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -22% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $90K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.