Camp Impact

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474372273
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Arlington, TX, USA
Phone
8179198514
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Camps

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,614
Expenses
$91,963
Assets
$135,768
Liabilities
$212

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSH FRIEDENSOHN (BOARD PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOSH FRIEDENSOHN (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL STEER (BOARD MEMBER)
  • LYNDA FRIEDENSOHN (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Camp impact is a free day camp provided to underpriviledged and homeless children in the arlington and grand prairies area. The foundation's mission is to provide a carefree week where kids can truly be kids.

What it reported doing in 2025

Renting of camp, girl scout of north Texas food, and catering for 120 campers, 60 youth counselors and 50 volunteers, held at camp whispering cedars in duncanville , Texas, for the 2nd week of june.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42.7%; rating input score 43
  • Program expense ratio: 56%; rating input score 56

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.8%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.48; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 34.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 55.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.8% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42.7% of revenue deployed · 56% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $51K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.