Camp Hope California
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 992806717
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8583542684
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Camps
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $92,628
- Expenses
- $28,183
- Assets
- $110,181
- Liabilities
- $1,875
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER MILLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER MILLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- LESLIE WILSON (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER)
- MARSHA WEINBERG (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The general purpose for which this corporation was formed was to provide services and support to children ages 6 to 18 years who have experienced the death/loss of a loved one. A "loved one" is a deceased person with whom the minor had a significant, ongoing personal relationship, including, but not limited to, a parent, sibling, grandparent, guardian, aunt, uncle, cousin or close friend. The corporation will sponsor weekend camps so grieving children can interact with and create friendships with other children or teens who have lost a loved one while participating in various indoor and outdoor camp-appropriate activities under the direction of trained bereavement counselors.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provide free camp for childcren who have experienced a loss of a lovd one. We provide a safe enviornment for grieving kids and teens as they share memories, make new friends, and hav fun.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 21%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 69.1%; rating input score 69
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 69.6%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.91; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 21% of revenue deployed · 69.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.