Camp For All Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760404267
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7136865666
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,623,403
- Expenses
- $6,757,289
- Assets
- $83,233,890
- Liabilities
- $6,234,996
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Patrice Prior Sorrells (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Patrice Prior Sorrells (President & CEO): $253,543 total reported compensation
- Mary Beth Mosley (Development Director): $164,625 total reported compensation
- Vanessa Garza (Finance Director): $155,849 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Camp For All transforms the world for children and adults with challenging illnesses, disabilities, or special needs.
What it reported doing in 2025
Camp For All partners with other nonprofit organizations to transform the lives of children and adults with challenging illnesses, disabilities, or special needs and their families, providing opportunities to discover hope, grow self-confidence, and realize they are not alone. More than 200,000 campers have attended since 1998. Camp For All in Burton, Texas, has the ability to serve nearly 9,000 campers, annually. Construction is almost complete on the second Camp in Chappell Hill, Texas, which will open in the summer of 2027. This will double the number of campers served to meet the ever-growing need. Barrier-free, both Camps welcome campers with cancer, autism, Muscular Dystrophy, lost limbs, spinal cord injuries, sickle cell, renal issues, epilepsy, visual and hearing challenges, and more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.3%; rating input score 27
- Program expense ratio: 72.1%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 97%; rating input score 97; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67.2%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.32; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 27.3% of revenue deployed · 72.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 32 of 33 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $254K · 35 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $14.5M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.